Biblia este „ură”, afirmă Biroul pentru Anti-semitism Global al Departamentului de Stat
de Rev. Ted Pike
„Biroul pentru Anti-semitism Global” al Departamentului de Stat susţine că afirmaţia din Noul Testament, prin care iudeii l-au lăsat pe Hristos să fie crucificat, constituie „anti-semitism clasic” - o formă istorică a urii. Cazul unui preot polonez, care a afirmat că iudeii l-au omorât pe Hristos, a fost inclus ca un „incident anti-semit”.
Sunteţi unul din zecile de milioane de creştini care sunt de acord cu Patimile lui Hristos de Mel Gibson că, conducători ai iudeilor au incitat o gloată de iudei şi l-au convins pe Pilat ca Hristos să fie crucificat? Guvernul vă consideră acum „anti-semiţi”. Sunteţi parte a unei plăgi mondiale, pe care SUA, Canada, Australia şi 55 de naţiuni europene s-au unit s-o înăbuşe.
În multe ţări, conduse de legi ale urii, este deja un delict federal repetarea „literaturii urii” a Noului Testament, că iudeii l-au lăsat pe Hristos să fie crucificat. Echivalarea Departamentului de Stat a creştinătăţii biblice cu „ura” este un indicator prevestitor de rele. Liga Anti-Defăimare a B’nai B’rith - arhitectul legilor urii pe plan mondial (şi forţa primară ideologică şi de colectare a statisticilor din spatele Biroului pentru Anti-semitism Global) - se îndreaptă rapid spre crearea unei polarizări împotriva creştinilor ca propovăduitori ai urii, în particular a iudeilor şi homosexualilor.
În profida sprijinirii pătimaşe a Israelului de către envanghelici, LAD afimă că, creştinătatea este inerent anti-semitică. LAD afirmă că Noul Testament este răsadul suspiciunii şi învinovăţirii iudeilor, care a condus la holocaustul din cel de-al 2-lea Război Mondial. Teleevanghelistul John Hagee, primitorul a numeroase premii ale Ligii Anti-Defăimare a B’nai B’rith, sprijină propaganda LAD.
El predică că iudeii nu L-au respins sau omorât pe Hristos, nu trebuie să-L accepte şi că, creştinătatea Noului Testament este o sursă primară de anti-semitism de-a lungul epocilor.
Cum mijloacele de informare în masă, dominate de iudei, conving progresiv publicul şi guvernul să consimtă acest stereotip, va deveni mai uşoară adoptarea legilor urii care să restricţioneze creştinii. Toţi cei care aderă la învăţăturile bibliei referitor la homosexualitate sau complicitatea iudeilor în moartea lui Hristos, pot deveni subiecţii urmăririi penale sponsorizate de stat.
Cei care cred în biblie nu sunt singurii în pericol. Raportul Departamentului de Stat susţine că sunt anti-semitice şi: afirmaţia „intenţionată sau neintenţionată” că statul Israel persecută palestinienii; critica „intenţionată sau neintenţionată” a sionismului sau Israelului, dacă această critică duce la diminuarea opiniei publice asupra iudeilor sau a guvernului, armatei sau poporului Israelului; publicarea de caricaturi descriind guvernul sau armata israeliene ca fiind similare nazismului; diminuarea cu orice cantitate a numărul de 6 milioane de victime ale holocaustului; pretinderea că iudeii exercită un control necuvenit asupra Congresului, Casei Albe sau mijloacelor de informare în masă; şi/sau afirmaţia că iudeii americani sunt egal loiali şi Israelului.
Congresul a votat unanim crearea acestui birou al desinformării asupra crimelor gândirii în 2004. Votaţi pentru terminarea influenţei sale: sunaţi gratis senatorii şi reprezentanţii dvs. la 1-877-851-6437. Spuneţi-le: „Vă rugăm să revocaţi finaţarea Biroului pentru Anti-semitism Global al Departamentului de Stat. Nu reprezintă cercetarea erudită ci polarizarea anti-creştină a LAD.”
Rev. Ted Pike este director al National Prayer Network, o organizaţie creştină/conservatoare de gardă. El poate fi contactat la 503-631-3808, www.truthtellers.org sau prin poştă la National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015
6 responses so far ↓
1 Mihai Rapcea // May 21, 2008 at 5:29 pm
Stirea asta pare desprinsa dintr-un scenariu SF. Sau mai rau, din 1984 a lui Orwell. E chiar pe bune !???
Daca este adevarata, inseamna ca intr-adevar se apropie sfarsitul lumii. Sau, cel putin al lumii americane si evreiesti.
2 Sauron // May 21, 2008 at 6:02 pm
orice imperiu, chiar si cel jidovesc se va distruge prin implozie! Nu va fi necesar sa fie atacat de altii, se va autodistruge!!!!
3 Harkonnen // May 22, 2008 at 9:34 am
“Biroul pentru Anti-semitism Global”… la Departametul de Stat al SUA!!!
Intelegeam daca americanii aveau un “Birou pentru Anti-americanism Global”, era justificat… asa, arata cine le sunt de fapt stapanii…
4 Zob Gheorghe // May 22, 2008 at 10:23 pm
Trebuie să ne asigurăm de valoarea de adevăr judecăţilor din text. E derutant.
Este socialmente caricatural. Deocamdată nu cred.
5 andrei dirlau // May 23, 2008 at 10:56 pm
Ba puteti crede - e absolut adevarat. E destul sa intrati pe http://www.truthtellers.org sau
http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/endamakeschristiansinto.htm si va veti convinge (daca stiti cat de cat lb engleza :)
6 gogutza // May 24, 2008 at 11:02 am
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/40258.htm
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/102406.htm
Exprimarea e mai eufemistica, dar tradusa in “limbaj normal” duce la aceleasi concluzii:
“The U.S. Government is committed to monitoring and combating anti-Semitism throughout the world as an important human rights and religious freedom issue. As President Bush said when he signed the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act on October 16, 2004, “Defending freedom also means disrupting the evil of anti-Semitism.”"
“Contemporary examples of anti-Semitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
# Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
# Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as a collective—such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
# Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
# Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g., gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
# Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
# Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.”
“Examples of the ways in which anti-Semitism manifests itself with regard to the state of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:
# Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.…
# Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
# Using the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
# Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
# Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.”
“The demonization of Israel, or vilification of Israeli leaders, sometimes through comparisons with Nazi leaders, and through the use of Nazi symbols to caricature them, indicates an anti-Semitic bias rather than a valid criticism of policy concerning a controversial issue.”
“Traditional anti-Jewish prejudice that has pervaded Europe and some countries in other parts of the world for centuries. This includes ultra-nationalists and others who assert that the Jewish community controls governments, the media, international business, and the financial world.
Strong anti-Israel sentiment that crosses the line between objective criticism of Israeli policies and anti-Semitism.
Anti-Jewish sentiment expressed by some in Europe’s growing Muslim population, based on longstanding antipathy toward both Israel and Jews, as well as Muslim opposition to developments in Israel and the occupied territories, and more recently in Iraq.
Criticism of both the United States and globalization that spills over to Israel, and to Jews in general who are identified with both.”
“Traditional forms of anti-Semitism persist and can be found across the globe. Classic anti-Semitic screeds, such as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and Mein Kampf, remain commonplace. Jews continue to be accused of blood libel, dual loyalty, and undue influence on government policy and the media, and the symbols and images associated with age-old forms of anti-Semitism endure. These blatant forms of anti-Semitism, often linked with Nazism and fascism, are considered unacceptable by the mainstream in the democratic nations of Western Europe, North America, and beyond, but they are embraced and employed by the extreme fringe.
Anti-Semitism has proven to be an adaptive phenomenon. New forms of anti-Semitism have evolved. They often incorporate elements of traditional anti-Semitism. However, the distinguishing feature of the new anti-Semitism is criticism of Zionism or Israeli policy that—whether intentionally or unintentionally—has the effect of promoting prejudice against all Jews by demonizing Israel and Israelis, and attributing Israel’s perceived faults to its Jewish character.
This new anti-Semitism is common throughout the Middle East and in Muslim communities in Europe, but it is not confined to these populations. For example, various United Nations bodies are asked each year on multiple occasions to commission investigations of what often are sensationalized reports of alleged atrocities and other violations of human rights by Israel. Various bodies have been set up within the UN system with the sole purpose of reporting on what is assumed to be ongoing, abusive Israeli behavior. The motive for such actions may be to defuse an immediate crisis, to show others in the Middle East that there are credible means of addressing their concerns other than through resort to violence, or to pursue other legitimate ends. But the collective effect of unremitting criticism of Israel, coupled with a failure to pay attention to regimes that are demonstrably guilty of grave violations, has the effect of reinforcing the notion that the Jewish state is one of the sources, if not the greatest source, of abuse of the rights of others, and thus intentionally or not encourages anti-Semitism.
Comparing contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis is increasingly commonplace. Anti-Semitism couched as criticism of Zionism or Israel often escapes condemnation since it can be more subtle than traditional forms of anti-Semitism, and promoting anti-Semitic attitudes may not be the conscious intent of the purveyor. Israel’s policies and practices must be subject to responsible criticism and scrutiny to the same degree as those of any other country. At the same time, those criticizing Israel have a responsibility to consider the effect their actions may have in prompting hatred of Jews. For example, at times hostility toward Israel has translated into physical violence directed at Jews in general. There was, for example, a sharp upsurge in anti-Semitic incidents worldwide during the conflict between Hizballah and Israel in the summer of 2006.”
“In April, the pastor of St. Brigid Church in Gdansk told parishioners during services that “Jews killed Jesus and the prophets” and displayed posters asserting that only Christians could be true citizens. The Archbishop of Gdansk subsequently removed the priest for this and other improprieties.”
Leave a Comment